14 September 2014. Another version posted to Pastebin:
13 September 2014
The Truth about Voice of Russias Liquidation
There have been rumors for a while about why the Voice of Russia radio station
was "liquidated" by Putin. Some of the staff who were sacked are trying to
expose what happened but it is very dangerous to speak out in the current
I see that a document was put of Pastebin recently, which might interest
Voice of Russia CIA Operation
By: a guest on Sep 1st, 2014
The Truth about VORs Liquidation
Over just a few months significant changes have taken place in the Russian
news services. From specialists who carefully monitor the Russian mass media
and the Kremlin, to the casual observers who like to watch events in Russia,
nobody could have failed to notice that something dramatic has occurred.
On 9th December 2013 came the surprise announcement that the Voice of Russia
and the RIA Novosti news agency were to be liquidated. The subsequent changes
were expected to be massive, and designed to consolidate all information
flow and propaganda under Kremlin control.
However, it is only now becoming clear just how insidious is the nature of
the merger, which leads one to doubt whether President Vladimir Putin or
his chief propaganda man, Dmitry Kiselyov, really do know what is happening
within the new organisation. Accurate information is not being reported to
these top men, and they are obviously being misinformed about the real situation.
President Putin has waged a defensive war against the encroachment into Russian
society and the Russian state by the CIA, NATO, USAID and U.S. NGOs.
Putins defence would appear to have been effective, at least on the
surface, but in reality the war has already been lost when we analyse the
current state of the Russian media.
Consider Operation Room With a View, which was a plan to bring
about the liquidation of one of the most strategic targets of the CIA in
its war with the USSR. Like Gladio, Northwoods and 9-11, Operation Room With
a View was apparently never shut down, despite the political changes that
have occurred within the former USSRs territories.
Operation Room With a View envisaged the destruction of the CIAs single
largest information opponent - the Voice of Russia - and was so named because
it was a secret goal of the Rockefeller family, one of the chief financiers
of the plan, to own an apartment overlooking the Kremlin and Red Square,
on the site of what was the VOR at 25 Pyatnitskaya Street.
To accomplish such a goal would indicate the complete destruction of the
Russian State and demonstrate the domination of Russia by the US. The Voice
of Russia has now been liquidated, and it is only a matter of time until
the state owned property at 25 Pyatnitskaya Street is sold off. This coup
de grace will mark a final victory for the CIA and the Rockefeller family
in their long running war against the Russian state.
It is a prime strategic objective of any state or entity, wishing to dominate
over a target country or power, to seize control of the state media - this
applies in any sort of war; cold or hot, overt or covert. This principle
is even truer today than it was at the height of the Cold War, as we live
in an age of information technologies. Any alert observer can see how these
United States neo-conservative 9-11 coup powers have continued to implement
their plan for total world domination, they wage illegal wars of aggression
and replace leaders and regimes at will, and any media outlet that sheds
light on this illegality becomes a target itself.
The classic war scenario has been seen many times before: the victor seizes
all the state media outlets, and begins transmitting on the defeated
partys airwaves, hence declaring the complete defeat of its enemy.
This process has been going on by stealth within the Russian media since
the end of the Cold War.
It was a decree issued by President Putin himself that led to the liquidation
of the Voice of Russia, but this decision represents a victory for the CIA
that had them celebrating for weeks. The fact that RIA Novosti was to continue
as it was, served as the literal icing on the cake for the CIA and the
Rockefellers, and all the other neocon Russia haters, as this agency was
already under their control. But it does not end there; with Putins
delusional propaganda man and hero of Russia, Dmitry Kiselyov, running the
whole thing under the name of the US infiltrated Russia Today, this was a
big bonus for the CIA.
Sources who formerly worked inside these organisations are now talking about
what they know, and as the organisations no longer exist their disclosure
agreements do not apply. The story being told is that the liquidation of
the Voice of Russia was like a bloodbath, and a real coup for the western
corporate media, the CIA and those forces intent on damaging Russia.
On the surface, the appearance was that the anti-Kremlin RIA Novosti and
the US apologist Voice of Russia were being liquidated because they did not
effectively promote Russia or the Russian state. However, this was only partially
true in the case of RIA Novosti, which took an almost openly anti-Kremlin
and anti-Putin stance, its liquidation was long overdue. The situation with
the Voice of Russia was quite different, as that organisation had to be
infiltrated and taken apart to give the appearance that it had been compromised
and was against the Kremlin, in order to justify the liquidation order being
For those interested in the Soviet Union and later Russia watchers, Radio
Moscow, which eventually became the Voice of Russia (the official voice of
the Russian Government), was always a direct source for information about
Russia and a reliable place to learn about the opinion of official Moscow.
Therefore the complete liquidation of the Voice of Russia, the first worldwide
broadcaster in history and an icon in the history of world media, into nothing
more than a page on the RIA-Novosti website and a couple of channels in English
speaking countries, may have been unexpected.
Radio Moscow and the Voice of Russia had for a long time the status of being
household names, whereas the liquidation of RIA Novosti, a little known brand
in the West, with its anti-Kremlin editorial policies, was less obviously
going to be noticed.
For information consumers, and others active in the global mass media or
information dissemination fields, who were worried by corporate and government
control of the mass media, in particular by the US Government and the governments
of its allies, the Voice of Russia and Russia Today were seen as perhaps
two of the last bastions of media freedom in the world. Both of these outlets
covered issues, people and opinions that no one else would, and this was
one of the key reasons why they were targeted by the CIA.
Those who want a more independent, strong and free media, compared to the
Wests fabricated narrative and mainstream media corporate propaganda,
were hoping that the liquidation would lead to a stronger more independent
and truthful body and an end to the western neo-liberalism that was creeping
into Voice of Russia programming. It was also obvious to all that there was
a softening of the Russian position, in an attempt to appease the West and
appear inoffensive to those brainwashed by the US MSM.
Many news consumers, experts, politicians, information activists and those
concerned with issues unpopular with the US Government, relied on the Voice
of Russia for a balanced view and an alternative and more importantly an
honest narrative of the events of the day. In many cases VOR was one of the
few sources of reporting on issues banned from western mass media outlets.
Sadly those media consumers must be extremely disappointed if they had hoped
for a more robust and independent media alternative.
For the supporters of WikiLeaks and for those who fight for truth in the
media and for information to be free, unfortunately more freedom is not on
the cards. The CIA, the globalists and their army of oligarchs and CIA moles
have apparently won.
If the CIA, NATO, the US Government and the Western mass media, who are waging
information warfare worldwide, were worried about their narrative being
challenged then they can breathe a sigh of relief. The truth has been relegated
to the least important place in the Russian or English language press, or
in other words to page 23, if it is there at all.
The destruction of the Voice of Russia occurred from within and it was a
process that took place over some time. Despite the robust and pro-Russian
editorial policies of the Russian language service, whose editorial guidelines
started with the phrase: We are here to serve the President of the
Russian Federation, the infiltration of anti-Russian elements took
their toll. There were attacks on the credibility of the VOR through other
services, and these attacks were designed in such a way as to either put
blame on non-Russian staff, or to give the appearance of
soft-propaganda, or to simply please the audience.
The key target for the CIA was of course the VORs English Service and
those who staffed it. There have been many popular presenters over the years,
from Kiril Watts, aka Karl Watts, the founding voice at Radio Moscow
International, to an American refugee John Robles who according
to his own words assisted the Russian intelligence agencies.
But many of the staff of Kremlin propagandists, KGB cooperators and VOR
personalities were on secret CIA lists either as targets for recruitment,
as persons of interest or even marked for outright assassination.
Through USAID media connected NGOs, influence could be exerted on political
parties such as the Yabloka Party run by USAID poster boy Boris Nemstov.
Through the placement of CIA and MI-6 assets in upper management positions
the CIA and its special partner MI-6 were able to infiltrate
and manipulate editorial policy and the content of the VOR. Even the former
chairman was manipulated through his friendship with CIA colour
revolution architect Michael McFaul, who had been sent to Moscow to carry
out a regime change operation against President Vladimir Putin.
The office of the Yabloka Party, located a block and a half from 25 Pyatnitskaya
Street was an ideal location to monitor the VOR and to meet sources. The
CIA was also able to monitor the entire building at 25 Pyatnitskaya, which
was hooked into an NSA surveillance net. The site contained over 2,500 computers,
and thousands of microphones and video cameras, as well as a magnetic card
entry system. Everyone who worked at the VOR, and everything that went on
there, was instantly known to the NSA/CIA.
Russian Counter-Intelligence was aware of the situation and they implemented
counter measures to block the surveillance. However, the NSA, aided by access
through back doors into Windows XP, which was installed on every
computer at the VOR, the monitoring of social media, access to the telephone
servers, RF monitoring and access to VOR servers, meant that the NSA was
able to monitor and even interact with every process going on at the VOR.
The CIA was able to place assets in all the key areas, and these agents were
used to alter information in reports, to discredit or kill stories, and even
to threaten and intimidate staff to present the news in a way that aided
the US. There are also suspicions that some staff have been assassinated,
as was the case with Karl Watts. Mr. Watts was targeted at a cafe in Egypt
when he was on holiday and had been on a CIA hit list for decades, although
he was not easily accessible and due to his status during Soviet times he
would have been too dangerous to liquidate.
People who worked in VORs Internet Department have stated that there
were secret editorial policies in place. Staff were given verbal
instructions about how to operate, but no written record was allowed to be
kept in case these instructions became known to others. One example indicating
subversion, and an attack on the sovereignty of Russia, was the constant
placing of American flags on the home page of the VOR website. According
to sources, this concern was noticed and commented on by many staff over
the years, and was reported with other editorial policies and suspicious
activity against the Russian state to the law enforcement bodies, the Russian
Prosecutor Generals Office and even the FSB.
Many of the staff at the VOR had participated in the Bolotnaya Protests,
and these people have actively been involved in promoting or suppressing
various issues and persons in support of the CIA and NSA - in other words
they were acting like Fifth Column operatives. According to one source, many
of the staff were also vehemently opposed to President Putin and this was
reflected in editorial policy and the message that was being broadcast.
One of those who was active in the Bolotnaya Protests, Linda Miles, is now
a key figure at Radio VR, and she was brought on board by Maxim Krassovsky,
another Fifth Columnist working at RIA-Novosti. Krassovsky turned up in 2010,
when the VOR was just beginning to regain its former glory. Sources inside
the VOR have said that the editorial polices Krassovsky brought with him
led to a softening of the message, the extensive use of social
media, in order to facilitate NSA surveillance, a reduction in reporting
NATO stories, and also no questions about 9-11 or American neo-conservatives.
Another interesting figure is a translator named Mikhail who was a leading
asset for CIA operations at the VOR. Recruited through contacts in the
Peoples National Party, the Russian nationalist organisation, his style
of translating was very effective in discrediting the VOR and the Russian
Government. According to sources he was banned from the site but not until
he had successfully done much damage to the stations message over many
In accordance with the secret policy guidelines, the translators and those
producing transcripts would often misquote or make seemingly innocent errors,
resulting in text that would state the exact opposite of what was actually
said. For example, when the issue of NATO missile defence plans was being
discussed, many officials were being translated as making statements in favour
of NATO, when what they actually said was quite the opposite.
Information on the sources of stories and interviews were continuously passed
on to the CIA, and this led to several deaths and attempted assassinations.
Even when dealing with vulnerable sources, the full name and contact information
of all sources was required to be in the possession of VOR upper management,
who then passed the information on to the CIA. Such information included
the details of key WikiLeaks members, the Occupy Movement activists, and
During the final years of the VOR, there were several instances of extreme
measures being taken to cripple the effectiveness of the organisation. On
one occasion a member of staff, who was responsible for the VOR Facebook
page, was called into a meeting and threatened with a baseball bat because
she had spoken out in support of Hugo Chavez, at the time when the CIA was
in the process of liquidating him. On multiple occasions the website was
completely redesigned in such a manner that links were lost, material disappeared
and the Google ranking dropped. It was apparent that such action was taken
for the purpose of suppressing and eliminating information, stories and material
that was damaging to the CIA.
MI-6 even sent in an operative who had worked for the BBC Russian Service
and was tasked with keeping stories about MI-6s involvement in Moscow
out of the news.
According to several former employees of the Voice of Russia, whose jobs
were affected by the shakeup at the VOR and who provided information for
this report, the greatest changes began with the appearance of Mark Stolyar,
Victoria Alhimova and Ekaterina Pavlovna.
These individuals were given complete control and unlimited authority to
make whatever changes they desired to the Voice of Russia. Several former
employees considered these changes to be equivalent to subversion and they
filed complaints with the Russian Investigative Committee and even the Federal
Security Service. Apparently these complaints were not pursued, and the
complainants were conveniently brushed aside, ignored or marginalized, which
was made easier in the confusion as VOR went through the breakup process.
A long list of employees were judged to be too old or too
Soviet in their views on defending Russia and its political position,
and they were dismissed along with entire departments. The destruction of
VOR was systematic: Russian culture programmes, historical programmes, music
programmes and even Russian Orthodox Church programmes, all were axed and
cut from the schedule. Notable commentators like Valentin Zorin and others
were quietly removed from the station, although they had spent their lives
promoting the Russian State and the Russian Government.
Under the triumvirate of Alhimova, Pavlovna and Stolyar everything Russian
at the VOR was eradicated and anyone pro-Russia and pro-Putin was marginalised,
threatened, sacked or simply forced out. Their policy was to demand an
unquestioning compliance with any order they issued, and this caused many
staff to leave, especially those who understood these individuals hidden